Pest Management Options:  Crown and Root Suckers 

tree with suckers around base
This young apple tree has profuse suckers around the crown of the tree. Left unmanaged, the suckers will grow up into the lower parts of the tree.  Photo by Teryl Roper.

Many types of fruit trees produce suckers around the base of the tree. Crown suckers arise in the area immediately surrounding the tree trunk (Photo 1). Root suckers can arise from roots further away from the trunk. Suckers around trees are unsightly and they can harbor insect pests like wooly apple aphids and can be points of entry for diseases like fire blight. If suckers are profuse, they interfere with in-row weed management and can absorb systemic herbicides such as glyphosate. Some rootstocks used for fruit trees such as M.7 for apples and Mazzard for cherries are genetically predisposed to produce suckers. M.9 clone RN-29 is more inclined to sucker than other M.9 clones. In some cases, sucker growth is a symptom of partial incompatibility between the rootstock and scion. Suckers can also result from injury to the crown such as extreme cold or mechanical injury. Whatever the cause, managing suckers takes time and expense. 

Sucker management falls into two general categories: mechanical and chemical. Each approach has merit depending on the orchard situation.

Mechanical Control

When only a few suckers are present, they are often removed during dormant pruning. In severe cases, sickle bar style mowers or gas-powered hedge shears have been used to remove suckers. However, when suckers are mechanically removed multiple new shoots can arise from cutting a single sucker, making the problem worse. Mechanical control is also expensive and labor intensive and may have to be done more than once per year.  

Related to mechanical control is control by heat. In a USU trial, burning suckers with a propane torch provided good control that lasted several weeks. This may be an effective approach for a few suckers here and there. Treating an entire block with a torch would require very slow travel speeds and would consume a substantial amount of propane. Care would also need to be taken to not damage irrigation tubing.

Chemical Control

Chemical control of suckers can be effective and is less labor intensive than mechanical control. Many acres can be treated in a day by a single operator. Chemical controls for suckers can be grouped into three categories: Plant growth regulators, herbicides, and desiccants.  

Plant Growth Regulators

Commercial fruit growers have long used a synthetic auxin, Naphthalene Acetic Acid (NAA), to reduce the growth of suckers. This is the same plant growth regulator (PGR) that is used to thin fruit, but the timing, and concentration are very different. Because NAA will cause a thinning response, application must be delayed until a month after petal fall. This allows time for the fruit to set and become less sensitive to NAA. Nevertheless, application should be made at a low pressure (10-20 psi) using nozzles that produce large droplets to reduce drift. A specific formulation of NAA (Tre-Hold A-112™) is registered for this use. For apples a single annual application with a 0.5% to 1% solution of NAA should reduce the growth of root suckers.  


Some specific contact herbicides are registered for sucker management for fruit trees. While these are registered for sucker suppression or control, they are still herbicides and can damage trees, especially young trees where the bark is green and not yet corky.  Therefore, extra care must be taken during application to not treat tree trunks. Young trees should have trunk wraps installed before application of herbicide products. Contact herbicides have the added advantage of providing some control for weeds that may have emerged since spring herbicide applications.

General principles for application of herbicides for sucker management include spraying only when winds are calm, using low pressure, and large droplet size. Low drift nozzles are preferred. The use of off-center nozzles may lead to overspray on trunks. For these contact herbicides, good coverage of the foliage is essential. Thus, sufficient water must be sprayed to thoroughly wet the leaves. Control is best when the suckers are still young and succulent, and not woody.

Paraquat (Gramoxone™) is a caustic, non-systemic, post-emergent herbicide that burns green vegetation. Paraquat is rapidly absorbed by green plant tissues and reacts with photosynthesis to produce superoxides that kill the plant cells. Paraquat is highly toxic to humans and is a restricted use pesticide that can only be mixed and applied by certified pesticide applicators. It provides good burn down of suckers at the higher rates.

Glufosinate (Rely 280™, Cheetah™) is another contact herbicide that is registered for sucker management. It is the slowest acting of the herbicide products included in this fact sheet. It can take 20-25 days to reach the level of control provided by the other herbicides in 10-14 days.

Carfentrazone-ethyl (Aim EC™) is registered for sucker control in fruit trees. Aim must be applied using a hooded sprayer to minimize the opportunity for drift. Also, it must be mixed with an appropriate rate of a nonionic surfactant or crop oil concentrate. While Aim is effective at controlling suckers while they are green and non-woody, the opportunity for injury from drift makes this a less desirable choice.

Pyraflufen-ethyl (Venue™) is a contact herbicide for post-emergent control of a range of broadleaf weeds. It also has a supplemental label for control of suckers in fruit trees. It is fast acting and effective at the 4 fl. oz/a rate. Cherry suckers are more susceptible to Venue than apple suckers.  

Table 1. Use patterns for herbicides registered for sucker control in tree fruits. Check product labels for specific use information.

Generic Name
Trade Name
Rate/acre Applications/year REI (hours)
2.5 to 4 pt/acre 3 12
Rely, Cheetah
48 to 56 fl oz/acre 2 12
2 fl oz/acre --- 12
3 to 4 fl oz/acre 3 12


row of trees with desiccated suckers
Apple trees with profuse suckering one week after treatment with UAN in Kaysville, Utah. The foliage has all been desiccated by the treatment. Photo by Samuel Johnson.

Recently we became aware of a material that is being used elsewhere for sucker control in tree fruits and nuts. Urea Ammonium Nitrate (UAN) is a liquid fertilizer that is a powerful desiccant. It is not registered as a pesticide. It can be purchased in co-op agronomy centers in the Intermountain West. When sprayed on suckers in the spring it desiccates the succulent foliage and stunts growth. Since it is 32% nitrogen, by weight, it also provides additional nitrogen when applied for sucker control.

In orchards, not all rootstocks are equally prone to sucker. We recommend avoiding planting apple trees on M.7 rootstocks. Also, when nursery trees are ‘high-budded’ so the root system can be planted slightly lower, this can reduce the amount of suckering. However, this approach can be overdone. Avoiding mechanically damaging rootstocks can also prevent suckering.

Literature Cited

Johnson, S.L. 2020.  Opportunities for Optimal Apple Production Management in Arid Conditions. Utah State University. MS Thesis.

Smith, T.J. and E Gutierrez. 2014. Evaluation of Venue, Gramoxone, Aim, and Rely Herbicides for Root and Crown Sucker Control in Apple and Cherry.  Massachusetts Fruit Notes 79:1-4.

Tukey, R.B. and T.J. Raese. 1995. Chemical control of water sprouts and suckers.  Washington State University, Extension Bulletin EB1593.

References to chemicals in this publication are for your convenience and are not endorsements of particular products over other similar products. Plant growth regulators are classified as pesticides by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. You are responsible for using pesticides according to the manufacturer’s current label directions. Follow directions exactly to protect people and the environment from pesticide exposure. Failure to do so violates the law.

This information is provided as an educational tool to inform growers what materials are legal to apply and what is effective. No implication is intended that Utah State University recommends the use of any materials.